School business managers and headteachers across Sheffield and South Yorkshire can use this indicative tool to compare ICT costs. Based on benchmark assumptions and publicly available data, it provides a helpful starting point for identifying where spending may be higher than expected — and where a review could uncover potential efficiencies.
Comparator group appears after the school is selected.
The comparison appears after the school is selected.
Historical trend summary appears after the school is selected.
Public benchmark data and school information
Indicative
Final savings depend on tariffs, contracts, site usage and supplier confirmation.
Indicative estimate only. Based on available public data, benchmark assumptions and information provided by the school. Final savings depend on current contracts, service requirements and supplier confirmation.
ICT budgets in schools across Sheffield and South Yorkshire vary based on pupil numbers, current contracts, and specific service requirements. Using the DfE-recognised benchmark of GBP 50–GBP 70 per pupil, this tool highlights whether your annual ICT expenditure appears above, below, or in line with typical levels. The output is entirely indicative and is designed to support better-informed budget planning, not to prescribe a specific outcome.
To produce an indicative comparison, the calculator needs your School size information and your current annual ICT spend. When that data is available, the tool returns a quick evidence-led estimate. Where data is missing — for example, from school financial benchmarking or supplier pricing — the result will clearly state that the estimate relies on benchmark assumptions and may not reflect local contract conditions.
A useful next step is to check whether your existing ICT contracts align with the services your staff and pupils actually use. Even where total spend appears typical, the mix of hardware, software licensing, support and connectivity can create opportunities. Our indicative output is designed to open that conversation — not to end it — and any final judgement should always be checked against live supplier quotes and your own financial records.
No. The output is an indicative comparison only. It uses benchmark assumptions and the figures you provide. Final savings — if any — depend entirely on your current contracts, service needs and live supplier quotes.
Staying below the GBP 50–GBP 70 range often suggests you are managing ICT costs effectively. However, it is still worth checking that your current provision meets teaching and safeguarding requirements; under-investment can sometimes create hidden risks.
At this stage, Edunet Portal provides indicative, evidence-led comparisons. A definite saving can only be calculated once your specific contract details are reviewed alongside live supplier options. The tool is designed to help you decide whether that deeper review is worth pursuing.
The ICT spend review looks at per-pupil spend, top-20 comparator context and budget review signals. It does not change the calculator values or replace a finance-led review.
This page keeps the local review wording separate from the school-specific calculator result, so the evidence remains tied to the selected school.